Selected Tag:

DC Dirty Pool

March 16th, 2010
Health Care Reform?

So where do you stand on health care reform? Are you in the camp that believes politics is taking the lead? Do you see this as a Washington insider health care hijacking?

Maybe you’re okay with the process as long as the results help the ones who we’re supposedly helping. Maybe you see millions of uninsured and those with pre-existing conditions and how they’ll benefit.

Latest polls reveal that 43% of Americans fall into the second camp. However, 53% are vehemently opposed while 4% are unsure.

So many of us on each side of this fence assures much democratic debate (as well as some unhealthy tactics). The historical implications will resonate for decades (if not longer) should this bill pass.

So where do you stand? With the 43%? With the 53%? Or somewhere in the middle? Yet another dimension near and dear to all this: how will this bill’s passing or not passing affect HME providers?

deliciousfacebooklinkedintwitter

Spring to Action

March 8th, 2010

I had to mention “spring” today. Following a gorgeous weekend, we’re expecting blue skies, warm sunshine and near 60-degrees today. I brought gloves and a ball in case anyone has a few minutes to play catch at lunch time.

You’ve heard the adage about how things usually occur in threes? Well, three HME providers within the past ten days experienced server failures.

CAU’s offices normally work at an uptempo pace, but you should see how we kick into overdrive when an HME provider’s revenue is threatened. (After all, HME providers have enough hurdles to get properly reimbursed!)

This entire process springs into action: coordination, acquiring the latest data, creating a new Web Edition world, migrating the data, creating user accounts, testing data, introducing staff to Web Edition navigation, and usability with our close monitoring. This process goes day and night so that the provider may be productive the following day.

We love these success stories. They exemplify why we’re here.

I plan to interview a few of the owners to share their stories with you. Meanwhile, blue skies!

deliciousfacebooklinkedintwitter

Misery Has Company

March 3rd, 2010

According to this post from Home Health News, HME isn’t the only side of home care threatened by CMS.

Sound familiar?

deliciousfacebooklinkedintwitter

101 Reasons

March 2nd, 2010

I’m more than a little embarrassed to live and work in the capital city of the Keystone state without having heard of this movement before now. Universal health care for all Pennsylvanians? Really?

I plan to learn more about this, but for now, I’ll share with you the HealthCare4AllPA 101 Reasons why this organization believes it’ll work. And a number of PA legislators from both sides of the aisle are on board.

Is this health care’s “magic pill?” The bipartisan effort alone is refreshing, but I’ll reserve euphoria or judgment until I dive into the details. I’ll let you know if I need a lifesaver.

deliciousfacebooklinkedintwitter

Amish Health Insurance

February 24th, 2010

The outrage over health insurance premiums rising annually by double digits, especially this recent eye-opener, got me to thinking. The current system is unsustainable.

No one (employers, individuals, government) can plunk down enough dough to make this problem go away. However, I know of one “simple” solution.

This solution has worked for the Amish for generations. And it works for them in any situation for which the rest of us believe we require insurance.

Besides the Amish people living humbly to honor God, they promote good health by eating naturally, working physically and avoiding many stresses of modern life. Plus, they help each other in times of need.

The Amish are not forbidden by their faith to seek medical treatment. Whenever an Amish person becomes ill and welcomes modern medicine, the family pays the cost. Whatever the family cannot afford will be provided by the rest of the community.

The result? The family’s medical bills are paid. And not one penny was wasted on years of health insurance premiums.

Can we learn anything from the Amish propping up the less fortunate among them? How about we all band together to say, “You want to raise our health insurance rates through the roof annually? Tell you what: we all quit. You get nada. Stick that in your premium pipe and smoke it.”

Put another way, can we as a nation that’s had enough come together to scare the profit margin and rate increase-happy health insurers? From now on, we help ourselves by helping each other. That’s what it’s all about anyway.

deliciousfacebooklinkedintwitter

“We’re Overregulated”

February 22nd, 2010

I must have been in just the right mood when the PECOS delay was announced last week. That’s what led to last Friday’s post.

You see, I’d just read an article (what was supposed to be leisure reading) in a January issue of The Sporting News. John Feinstein penned an article about college basketball’s dichotomy: graduation rate vs. winning percentage.

In that article, a quote from Duke coach, Mike Krzyzewski, hit me right between the eyes, “We’re overregulated…. Until that changes, things won’t get better.” All of a sudden, that quote transformed my leisure reading into echoing the challenges of HME providers.

“Overregulated.” Obviously, there needs to be some oversight; however, the pendulum has swung so far to the side of punishing innocent HME providers that patients are beginning to feel the pinch.

“Until that changes, things won’t get better.” Not for beneficiaries, not for taxpayers, not for anyone in this health care vertical.

deliciousfacebooklinkedintwitter

PECOS Phase 2 Delayed (Again)

February 18th, 2010

Did you ever wonder how these decisions are made? I mean, imagine the political appointees sitting around a conference table to discuss PECOS.

I can just imagine how pleased they must have been with themselves after one presented the idea to create a whole new database of physicians for the sole purpose of verifying their NPIs, which already (supposedly) had been a vetting process to help prevent health care fraud and abuse. My head spins just thinking about it.

When I allow my imagination to delve into these dark places, I can picture them high-fiving each other as their meeting adjourns. “Another victory for the American taxpayer.”

Of course, they delegate other minions (paid for by us) to administer PECOS, yet another government health care directive and its details. If it weren’t so absurd, it’d be laughable.

How bad is this idea? If PECOS was so wonderful, why has Phase 2 implementation been delayed a second time — this time for nearly a full year? Just counting all the ways is depressing.

Let’s start with putting the onus on the providers that can’t get reimbursed without action by other providers who have no incentive to comply because their reimbursement isn’t affected. I wonder who came up with that one.

Then there’s the eventual unveiling of the great and wonderful PECOS database — as a PDF! Obviously, some government employees had been tasked to create the database. But then they were tasked to convert it to a nearly useless format so companies like ours would need to spend time to reverse the process in order to properly help our clients.

When testing our version of the PECOS database against client data, we discovered that approximately 50% of physicians had enrolled. So, the same people you need to bother for ever more medical necessity documentation now also must enroll in PECOS for the same reason: so you, the HME provider, can get paid for products and services rendered.

Anyone have aspirin? My head hurts, and another brilliant government idea called NCB is still barreling toward us at breakneck speed.

deliciousfacebooklinkedintwitter

Still a Major Threat – Part 2

February 17th, 2010

Hopefully, you’ve had an opportunity to read Part 1 of Todd Tyson’s guest post regarding national competitive bidding. Let’s continue with Part 2:

“What does this mean for Medicare beneficiaries? Limited access, no choice, substandard equipment and services. What good can come from low bid providers being awarded contracts with Medicare? Savings sure, but at what cost? Extended hospital stays, patients’ safety concerns, restricted number of providers, elimination of 90% of small business providers.

“HME is the most cost-effective and slowest-growing portion of Medicare spending according to the most recent National Health Expenditures data from CMS. HME accounts for less than 1.5% of the Medicare budget; and, CMS hopes to expand CB to physicians, hospitals and other health care providers in order to cut costs and ration health care to seniors and people with disabilities.

“CB will likely increase spending because it will shift cost from Medicare Part B (Home) to Part A (Hospital). Longer hospital stays and cost shifting from home to the institutional setting will surely follow service disruption and limited access for beneficiaries. Currently under Medicare, a day of oxygen therapy costs less than $7 per day while a day in the hospital costs more than $5500.

“Home care is the most cost effective way to treat most patients; and, home is where most people would rather be. HME is one solution to rising health care costs; but, once again the Federal government has put our Medicare beneficiaries at risk in order to eliminate providers, because they cannot control costs, fraud or abuse in the system. Once again they want to say that providers are the crooks when they [the Feds] are the ones that issued the provider a supplier number and are responsible for policing the behavior.

“There are numerous home care heroes that are out at all hours of the day and night providing in-home services so that patients can live independently in their homes where they prefer to be. These heroes appear at a moment’s notice ready to discharge you from the hospital, follow you home to install equipment, educate/instruct patients and caregivers on proper use, and then leave only to provide 24 hour, 7 day per week on-call services and follow-up to those that need it. Congress is clueless about the services component involved with HME and only reimburses for the equipment. HME is so much more than that and deserves the recognition that HME is the solution and NOT the problem.

“Crook or Caregiver? You be the judge! Call your representatives and ask them to protect HME by sponsoring HR3790 to repeal Medicare Competitive Bidding.”

Thanks to Todd for his contribution. He’s touched on several valid points. Please comment if you have anything to add.

deliciousfacebooklinkedintwitter

PECOS Simplified

February 16th, 2010

If you bill Medicare, by now you’re painfully familiar with ineligible ordering/referring provider edits. Medicare requires that for you to receive payment for providing medical equipment, the ordering or referring doctor must be enrolled with Medicare’s Provider Enrollment, Chain and Ownership System (PECOS) system.

Right now, Medicare’s ineligible ordering/referring provider edits just alert you to a potential problem. However, on April 5, Medicare will begin rejecting claims if the ordering or referring doctor hasn’t enrolled in PECOS.

So what can you do? If you use CAU’s HME software, the answer is "take a deep breath and relax." We’ve got you covered.

To help you get the reimbursement that’s rightfully yours, we’ve enhanced our HME software to ensure that you receive the correct physician information directly from PECOS.

For example, any physician in the PECOS database displays in green in our Web Edition HME software. No downloading the huge PECOS PDF; no manual searching necessary.

If you wish to reference the PECOS database, we’ve added a smart lookup within Web Edition to make it as easy as possible for you. You never have to leave Web Edition to get the PECOS answers you need.

Over-regulation erects barriers to your success; we knock ‘em down. That’s just the way we prefer to serve our user base.

Please contact me, Brian Williams, to see this complimentary enhancement in action. It’s available to you today.

deliciousfacebooklinkedintwitter

Still a Major Threat to Home Care Viability

February 15th, 2010

Just for the record, we received more snow; but, compared to last week, we’ve barely felt Round Three of February’s worst. The real storm that threatens home care as we know it is national competitive bidding.

A well-respected HME provider and ten-year CAU client, Todd Tyson, recently authored his thoughts regarding the recurring NCB nightmare and what you can do about it. Here’s Part 1:

“Atlanta will soon begin the bidding process for the second round of Competitive Bidding (CB) for Medicare Home Medical Equipment (HME) slated to begin in Atlanta in 2011. CB was part of the Medicare Modernization Act (MMA) of 2003 that most of us recognize as the prescription drug bill which mandates that Medicare bid for home medical equipment and services. CB was originally supposed to begin in 10 Metropolitan Service Area (MSAs) in 2009 and expand to 80 more in 2010 including Atlanta however the program was so fatally flawed that Congress passed the Medicare Improvement for Patients and Providers Act (MIPPA) to postpone the implementation until 2010 so that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) could fix the problems inherent in the MMA.

“Sadly CMS has decided to move forward again with CB in 9 MSAs without any real improvement to the initial plan or process. The first round of bidding awarded contracts to providers that were not appropriately qualified or licensed to satisfy the regulatory requirements established by CMS supplier standards. Many winning bidders had never provided the services that they bid for and were awarded. Most did not have the credit necessary to fund the business and the growth required to satisfy the capacity that they were legally obligated to provide. One manufacturer was even quoted as saying that of the 380 winning bidders he would not extend credit to, more than 50% and several of the other 50% were already on credit hold.

“The original bid process was to yield a 27% saving to Medicare HME only because non-qualified underfunded bidders bid way below Medicare allowed fees. Some local providers bid low for fear that they would be barred from participation and other non-local providers bid even lower in order to eliminate local providers and gain new markets. No one truly understands why providers were willing to low ball bids, but the reality of the contracts was unsustainable for most bid winners.

“What does this mean for Medicare beneficiaries?” We’ll find out next time as we continue with Todd’s guest post. Meanwhile, you’re welcome to add your opinion to the conversation.

deliciousfacebooklinkedintwitter